header-logo header-logo

Benefit appeals

10 March 2011
Issue: 7456 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Delays in benefit appeals are creating homelessness and affecting claimants’ mental health, the Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council (AJTC) has said in a hard-hitting report.

In Time for Action, the AJTC calls for the introduction of a 42-day time limit for decision-makers to hear appeals on disability living allowance and other benefits.

The authors say appeals should be lodged with the Tribunals Service, not with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), and suggest that delays in housing benefit are urgently addressed, with early neutral evaluation to be piloted as a means of encouraging dispute resolution.

They also recommend making the listing process for appeals more flexible to give high priority to vulnerable cases.

Currently, while claimants must submit their appeal within one month, the DWP and HM Revenue & Customs need only respond “as soon as reasonably practicable”. In practice, however, the report states, the DWP took an average of 202 days to process appeals, with some cases taking longer than a year.

Richard Thomas, AJTC chair, said: “It is unacceptable to expect DWP customers simply to put up with ever longer delays to get their appeals heard in order, in many cases, to obtain the benefits they should have received from the outset of their claim.

“Never was the old legal maxim ‘justice delayed is justice denied’ more apt.”
 

Issue: 7456 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll