header-logo header-logo

Benefit appeals

10 March 2011
Issue: 7456 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Delays in benefit appeals are creating homelessness and affecting claimants’ mental health, the Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council (AJTC) has said in a hard-hitting report.

In Time for Action, the AJTC calls for the introduction of a 42-day time limit for decision-makers to hear appeals on disability living allowance and other benefits.

The authors say appeals should be lodged with the Tribunals Service, not with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), and suggest that delays in housing benefit are urgently addressed, with early neutral evaluation to be piloted as a means of encouraging dispute resolution.

They also recommend making the listing process for appeals more flexible to give high priority to vulnerable cases.

Currently, while claimants must submit their appeal within one month, the DWP and HM Revenue & Customs need only respond “as soon as reasonably practicable”. In practice, however, the report states, the DWP took an average of 202 days to process appeals, with some cases taking longer than a year.

Richard Thomas, AJTC chair, said: “It is unacceptable to expect DWP customers simply to put up with ever longer delays to get their appeals heard in order, in many cases, to obtain the benefits they should have received from the outset of their claim.

“Never was the old legal maxim ‘justice delayed is justice denied’ more apt.”
 

Issue: 7456 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll