header-logo header-logo

10 March 2011
Issue: 7456 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Benefit appeals

Delays in benefit appeals are creating homelessness and affecting claimants’ mental health, the Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council (AJTC) has said in a hard-hitting report.

In Time for Action, the AJTC calls for the introduction of a 42-day time limit for decision-makers to hear appeals on disability living allowance and other benefits.

The authors say appeals should be lodged with the Tribunals Service, not with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), and suggest that delays in housing benefit are urgently addressed, with early neutral evaluation to be piloted as a means of encouraging dispute resolution.

They also recommend making the listing process for appeals more flexible to give high priority to vulnerable cases.

Currently, while claimants must submit their appeal within one month, the DWP and HM Revenue & Customs need only respond “as soon as reasonably practicable”. In practice, however, the report states, the DWP took an average of 202 days to process appeals, with some cases taking longer than a year.

Richard Thomas, AJTC chair, said: “It is unacceptable to expect DWP customers simply to put up with ever longer delays to get their appeals heard in order, in many cases, to obtain the benefits they should have received from the outset of their claim.

“Never was the old legal maxim ‘justice delayed is justice denied’ more apt.”
 

Issue: 7456 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridgestrengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll