header-logo header-logo

The best fit

19 April 2013 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7556 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail
expertwitness

Chris Pamplin considers how easy it is to choose the right expert

In all cases involving expert evidence it is important to try to ensure that the expert selected has the necessary skills, qualifications and experience to provide a reasoned and valid opinion on the matters at issue. This may sound obvious and straightforward, and access to a resource like the UK Register of Expert Witnesses can help, but it is sometimes difficult to determine exactly what constitutes necessary skills, qualifications and experience and, in grey areas, what weight should be attached to the evidence of an expert whose experience does not match exactly the requirements of a particular case.

Patent difficulties

In DataCard Corporation v Eagle Technologies [2011] EWHC 244 (Pat), [2011] All ER (D) 199 (Feb) the High Court considered the differing qualifications of the expert witnesses involved and set out principles for weighing these qualifications.

The case revolved around the validity of patents related to different aspects of the printing of plastic cards, such as credit cards. DataCard

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll