header-logo header-logo

The best fit

19 April 2013 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7556 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail
expertwitness

Chris Pamplin considers how easy it is to choose the right expert

In all cases involving expert evidence it is important to try to ensure that the expert selected has the necessary skills, qualifications and experience to provide a reasoned and valid opinion on the matters at issue. This may sound obvious and straightforward, and access to a resource like the UK Register of Expert Witnesses can help, but it is sometimes difficult to determine exactly what constitutes necessary skills, qualifications and experience and, in grey areas, what weight should be attached to the evidence of an expert whose experience does not match exactly the requirements of a particular case.

Patent difficulties

In DataCard Corporation v Eagle Technologies [2011] EWHC 244 (Pat), [2011] All ER (D) 199 (Feb) the High Court considered the differing qualifications of the expert witnesses involved and set out principles for weighing these qualifications.

The case revolved around the validity of patents related to different aspects of the printing of plastic cards, such as credit cards. DataCard

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll