header-logo header-logo

10 December 2020 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Opinion , EU , Human rights , Brexit
printer mail-detail

European Convention on Human Rights: Better out than in?

34124
As the government announces a review of human rights law, Alec Samuels makes the case for the UK to leave the European Convention on Human Rights

Human rights appear to be a good thing. We are all in favour of human rights, surely. Co-operation with our European friends must be desirable, surely. The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) was created in response to the horrors of WWII. The text was drafted by British lawyers. The UK joined in 1951, accepted the right of individual petition in 1966, and incorporated the Convention into UK domestic law in the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998). In a democratic society, legal restraints upon government must, in principle, be desirable. UK jurisprudence has been enriched by European judicial learning. The UK has won most of the cases brought against it.

The maintenance of human rights, the protection of the rights of the individual under the rule of law, is an entirely separate matter from membership or otherwise of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll