header-logo header-logo

European Convention on Human Rights: Better out than in?

10 December 2020 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Opinion , EU , Human rights , Brexit
printer mail-detail
34124
As the government announces a review of human rights law, Alec Samuels makes the case for the UK to leave the European Convention on Human Rights

Human rights appear to be a good thing. We are all in favour of human rights, surely. Co-operation with our European friends must be desirable, surely. The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) was created in response to the horrors of WWII. The text was drafted by British lawyers. The UK joined in 1951, accepted the right of individual petition in 1966, and incorporated the Convention into UK domestic law in the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998). In a democratic society, legal restraints upon government must, in principle, be desirable. UK jurisprudence has been enriched by European judicial learning. The UK has won most of the cases brought against it.

The maintenance of human rights, the protection of the rights of the individual under the rule of law, is an entirely separate matter from membership or otherwise of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll