header-logo header-logo

European Convention on Human Rights: Better out than in?

10 December 2020 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Opinion , EU , Human rights , Brexit
printer mail-detail
34124
As the government announces a review of human rights law, Alec Samuels makes the case for the UK to leave the European Convention on Human Rights

Human rights appear to be a good thing. We are all in favour of human rights, surely. Co-operation with our European friends must be desirable, surely. The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) was created in response to the horrors of WWII. The text was drafted by British lawyers. The UK joined in 1951, accepted the right of individual petition in 1966, and incorporated the Convention into UK domestic law in the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998). In a democratic society, legal restraints upon government must, in principle, be desirable. UK jurisprudence has been enriched by European judicial learning. The UK has won most of the cases brought against it.

The maintenance of human rights, the protection of the rights of the individual under the rule of law, is an entirely separate matter from membership or otherwise of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll