header-logo header-logo

10 December 2020 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Opinion , EU , Human rights , Brexit
printer mail-detail

European Convention on Human Rights: Better out than in?

34124
As the government announces a review of human rights law, Alec Samuels makes the case for the UK to leave the European Convention on Human Rights

Human rights appear to be a good thing. We are all in favour of human rights, surely. Co-operation with our European friends must be desirable, surely. The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) was created in response to the horrors of WWII. The text was drafted by British lawyers. The UK joined in 1951, accepted the right of individual petition in 1966, and incorporated the Convention into UK domestic law in the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998). In a democratic society, legal restraints upon government must, in principle, be desirable. UK jurisprudence has been enriched by European judicial learning. The UK has won most of the cases brought against it.

The maintenance of human rights, the protection of the rights of the individual under the rule of law, is an entirely separate matter from membership or otherwise of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll