header-logo header-logo

30 January 2015 / Dr Tony Harvey
Issue: 7638 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Beware of dirty laundry

harvey

Are you prepared for increased anti-money laundering compliance scrutiny, asks Dr Tony Harvey

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is stepping up its efforts to ensure solicitors’ firms do not become embroiled in money laundering activity. All firms must be aware of anti-money laundering (AML) issues and SRA Chief Executive Paul Philip has said that there will be “serious consequences” for those who fail to take their obligations seriously.

In November 2014 the SRA published its latest guidance Cleaning up: Law firms and the risk of money laundering. Money laundering is identified by the SRA as a key priority current risk in the latest SRA Risk Outlook 2014/15. The SRA is also alert to the criticisms levied against the legal profession for the poor quality of its suspicious activity reports (SARs) by the UK National Crime Agency (NCA) in their 2014 statement. The SRA’s AML focus initiative will involve focus visits to law firms to test that robust AML systems are in place, how widely these systems are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll