header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
30 January 2015 / Dr Tony Harvey
Issue: 7638 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Beware of dirty laundry

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
harvey

Are you prepared for increased anti-money laundering compliance scrutiny, asks Dr Tony Harvey

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is stepping up its efforts to ensure solicitors’ firms do not become embroiled in money laundering activity. All firms must be aware of anti-money laundering (AML) issues and SRA Chief Executive Paul Philip has said that there will be “serious consequences” for those who fail to take their obligations seriously.

In November 2014 the SRA published its latest guidance Cleaning up: Law firms and the risk of money laundering. Money laundering is identified by the SRA as a key priority current risk in the latest SRA Risk Outlook 2014/15. The SRA is also alert to the criticisms levied against the legal profession for the poor quality of its suspicious activity reports (SARs) by the UK National Crime Agency (NCA) in their 2014 statement. The SRA’s AML focus initiative will involve focus visits to law firms to test that robust AML systems are in place, how widely these systems are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll