header-logo header-logo

11 March 2020 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7878 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Property
printer mail-detail

Beware the approach of the adverse possessors

17401
Adverse possession is a menace but landowners can take steps to protect themselves, says Alec Samuels
  • Adverse possession, and risks from squatters.
  • Land Registration Act 2002 protects owners.
  • Lawyers should advise clients to register title.

Adverse possession. There is still a lot of it about. Squatters’ rights, claiming title, usually arise when the paper owner of unregistered land, who seems to have been dormant or inactive for some years, decides to sell, lease or develop the land; or the squatters want to do likewise. The value of land is such these days that most paper owners keep a careful eye upon what is going on.

‘No action shall be brought by any person to recover any land after the expiration of 12 years from the date on which the right of action accrued to him or, if it first accrued to some person through whom he claims, to that person,’ Limitation Act 1980, s 15(1), and Accrual of rights of action to recover

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll