header-logo header-logo

11 March 2020 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7878 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Property
printer mail-detail

Beware the approach of the adverse possessors

17401
Adverse possession is a menace but landowners can take steps to protect themselves, says Alec Samuels
  • Adverse possession, and risks from squatters.
  • Land Registration Act 2002 protects owners.
  • Lawyers should advise clients to register title.

Adverse possession. There is still a lot of it about. Squatters’ rights, claiming title, usually arise when the paper owner of unregistered land, who seems to have been dormant or inactive for some years, decides to sell, lease or develop the land; or the squatters want to do likewise. The value of land is such these days that most paper owners keep a careful eye upon what is going on.

‘No action shall be brought by any person to recover any land after the expiration of 12 years from the date on which the right of action accrued to him or, if it first accrued to some person through whom he claims, to that person,’ Limitation Act 1980, s 15(1), and Accrual of rights of action to recover

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll