header-logo header-logo

Beware the approach of the adverse possessors

11 March 2020 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7878 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Property
printer mail-detail
17401
Adverse possession is a menace but landowners can take steps to protect themselves, says Alec Samuels
  • Adverse possession, and risks from squatters.
  • Land Registration Act 2002 protects owners.
  • Lawyers should advise clients to register title.

Adverse possession. There is still a lot of it about. Squatters’ rights, claiming title, usually arise when the paper owner of unregistered land, who seems to have been dormant or inactive for some years, decides to sell, lease or develop the land; or the squatters want to do likewise. The value of land is such these days that most paper owners keep a careful eye upon what is going on.

‘No action shall be brought by any person to recover any land after the expiration of 12 years from the date on which the right of action accrued to him or, if it first accrued to some person through whom he claims, to that person,’ Limitation Act 1980, s 15(1), and Accrual of rights of action to recover

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll