header-logo header-logo

27 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Family , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Beware the ‘predatory marriage’

18317
The concept of ‘predatory marriage’ may mean little to English lawyers and probate practitioners, but it is a phenomenon that can have serious and permanent testamentary effects, according to James McKean, New Square Chambers, and Shoosmiths solicitors Andrew Bishop and Hollie Richardson

In a revealing article for NLJ, the trio explain how individuals without mental capacity can be ensnared in a predatory marriage, both in this jurisdiction and abroad. These marriages are voidable not void and therefore cannot be challenged after death. Beneficiaries under previous wills are disinherited, largely without recourse. Consequently, practitioners should consider capacity to marry as they consider capacity to make a will. They outline recent caselaw and suggest practical points for lawyers to consider.

The article’s authors are campaigning on the issue, and seeking to revive attempts to reform the law―a previous private member’s bill ‘withered on the parliamentary vine’. Should readers wish to support or find out more, please email: Andrew.Bishop@shoosmiths.co.uk. The NLJ article can be found at: https://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/content/the-predatory-marriage-trap.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll