header-logo header-logo

Beware the ‘predatory marriage’

27 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Family , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
18317
The concept of ‘predatory marriage’ may mean little to English lawyers and probate practitioners, but it is a phenomenon that can have serious and permanent testamentary effects, according to James McKean, New Square Chambers, and Shoosmiths solicitors Andrew Bishop and Hollie Richardson

In a revealing article for NLJ, the trio explain how individuals without mental capacity can be ensnared in a predatory marriage, both in this jurisdiction and abroad. These marriages are voidable not void and therefore cannot be challenged after death. Beneficiaries under previous wills are disinherited, largely without recourse. Consequently, practitioners should consider capacity to marry as they consider capacity to make a will. They outline recent caselaw and suggest practical points for lawyers to consider.

The article’s authors are campaigning on the issue, and seeking to revive attempts to reform the law―a previous private member’s bill ‘withered on the parliamentary vine’. Should readers wish to support or find out more, please email: Andrew.Bishop@shoosmiths.co.uk. The NLJ article can be found at: https://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/content/the-predatory-marriage-trap.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll