header-logo header-logo

A bitter pill?

28 February 2014 / Sarah Moore
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

What impact will the new European Medical Device Regulations have on UK medicine, asks Sarah Moore

At the end of last year, after a year of fierce lobbying by patient groups and manufacturers alike, the new European Medical Device Regulations were finally submitted to the European Parliament and Council for debate and member state approval. When implemented, these new regulations will change legislation that has remained largely untouched for over 20 years.

Ongoing, high profile, prosthetic hip and breast implant litigation has played a key role in galvanising this change. However, exactly what impact these proposed regulatory changes will have, both for patient safety and product litigation in the UK remains to be seen.

EUCOMED, the organisation which speaks for European medical device manufacturers, has warned that the new regulations will stifle innovation and slow down the release of novel products into the market. For product liability lawyers, and others dealing with the after-effects of “novel” products, such as the ASR hip prosthesis, this change in pace has the potential at least to better

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll