header-logo header-logo

13 February 2015 / Sarah Moore
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

A bitter pill

moore

Are “Big Pharma” & voluntary codes ending the Dark Age of industry bias, asks Sarah Moore

On 1 January this year a spotlight was shone on the hitherto shady world of drug company payments to doctors in the UK.

From this date 98% of drug companies—all those represented by the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) are required to record any payments they make to doctors with a view to this data being uploaded onto a publicly searchable database from July 2016.

This innovation is the result of a new code adopted by the ABPI, which requires that if a healthcare professional agrees to do paid work for a company, they should sign a contract granting permission for the payment data to be shared publicly.

This data will be stored on a central platform on the ABPI website and will be available for at least two years. According to the ABPI, after the database launches in July 2016 anyone will be able to search for payment data and then download the entire dataset, probably

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
Pandemic, sanctions, armed conflict, blocked shipping corridors, transport disruption... in these uncertain times, every successful commercial entity must ensure they have an effective force majeure clause in place. But how exactly do you ensure this? 
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
Is AI a help or a potential risk? What do lawyers need to consider regarding their use of AI? How do they evidence the extent and scope of its use in their work?
back-to-top-scroll