header-logo header-logo

16 June 2011 / Kenneth Warner
Issue: 7470 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The blame game

Kenneth Warner examines causation & industrial disease

It is a basic principle of the law of torts that a defendant will be liable only for the harm that the defendant has caused. In cases of doubt it is incumbent on the plaintiff to show, on the civil standard of proof, that the tortious conduct of the defendant caused the injury that is complained of. In effect, evidence that the tort is the most likely cause of the harm will suffice to discharge the burden, but in principle anything short of that should result in a rejection of the plaintiff’s claim. This rule can cause great difficulties for a plaintiff, where there exist multiple possible causes in fact for the ultimate harm suffered. They may be multiple “guilty” causes; as where the claimant has been exposed to toxic agents with a number of different employers, each independently capable of producing the same disease. Again they may be “guilty” but separate causes which are capable of working cumulatively to bring about the plaintiff’s ultimate harm, as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll