header-logo header-logo

20 March 2013
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Bloggers beware!

Ruling in Thompson case highlights the risks of blogging

A blogger who sued a council chief executive for libel, and lost, has been ordered to pay £25,000 in damages, including £5,000 aggravated damages.

Jacqueline Thompson sued Carmarthenshire council chief executive Mark James for comments he made about her in a letter circulated to other councillors after she was ejected from a meeting for filming.

James counter-sued in respect of five postings on Thompson’s blog, Carmarthenshire Planning Problems and more. Thompson’s complaints arose from planning decisions.

Ruling in Jacqueline Thompson v Mark James & Ors [2013] EWHC 515 (QB); [2013] EWHC 585 (QB), Mr Justice Tugendhat found in favour of James in respect of three out of five blog posts.

Tugendhat J said Thompson was “engaged in an unlawful campaign of harassment, defamation and intimidation”, conducted through letters and e-mails and via her blog.

However, Thompson, whose blog won the Best Political Blog award at the Media Wales Wales Blog Awards 2011, said she was “devastated” by the decision.

“This has potentially opened the floodgates for similar actions and I believe this judgment has dire consequences for others who publicly scrutinise and criticise their local authority, including the press,” she said.

“I have always acted in good faith, my motives have always been sincere and have merely criticised the council where I felt it appropriate, and have never had a complaint until the counterclaim.

“I have no idea where I’m going to get £25,000 from, I haven’t got £25.”

In a statement, James said: “Councils and other public bodies accept that they are open to legitimate criticism, but this cannot extend to...unlawful harassment and unfounded allegations of wrongdoing by its officers.

“On the one occasion the council responded to her attacks Mrs Thompson secured the services of specialist libel solicitors and counsel and sued for libel with the benefit of a conditional fee agreement with success fee.”

Issue: 7553 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll