header-logo header-logo

A blot on the landscape

15 January 2009 / David Burrows
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

The child support system is needlessly cumbersome, says David Burrows

The government’s recent “overhaul” of the tribunal structure introduced two new tribunals; a First Tier and an Upper Tribunal. Child support and Child Support Commissioner appeals now come within this structure; though this is solely because of the anomalous position of child support as part of administrative, rather than family law.

The new scheme replaces the existing tribunal and commissioner’s jurisdictions and gives the Upper Tribunal the ability to receive referral of judicial review applications. Most tribunals transferred into the First-Tier and Upper Tribunal in phases from 3 November 2008, implementing the main provisions of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. In some cases new statutory appeal rights are created. In other cases appeal rights are moved from the courts to tribunals.

A press release heralding the changes claimed that “tribunal users [will] continue to experience a service that is speedy, inexpensive and accessible”. Looked at through the child support scheme spectrum this statement perhaps justifies scepticism. First “speedy” of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll