header-logo header-logo

05 October 2011
Issue: 7484 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Blow whistle for leniency

Solicitors who “blow the whistle” on misconduct could be given more lenient sanctions, under Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) plans

The SRA’s compliance committee is to recommend to the SRA board that it consult on a whistleblowing policy, under which solicitors would be offered leniency if they stepped forward to disclose wrongdoing and, if necessary, act as a witness in any court or tribunal hearing.

David Middleton, SRA director for legal and enforcement, said: “We estimate that a handful of cases every year might benefit if potential witnesses who may have been involved in some wrongdoing could come forward and be offered leniency as part of a co-operation agreement.

“Respondents to investigations are already aware that the early correction of problems and co-operating generally with us can significantly mitigate any failures on their part.”

When the Financial Services Authority (FSA) introduced a similar leniency scheme it reported that calls to its dedicated whistle-blowing line doubled between 2007 and 2009. The FSA’s director of enforcement said the leniency scheme had been “used to good effect”. The Office of Fair Trading carries a promise of similar incentive on its website.

Issue: 7484 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll