header-logo header-logo

17 April 2015 / Sara Wyeth , Anton van Dellen , Martin Khoshdel
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Bone of contention

nlj_april_17_wreth

Dr Anton van Dellen, Martin Khoshdel & Sara Wyeth report on another unfair bone in the ossuary

In Sagar v Health Education England [2014] EWHC 3696 (Admin), [2014] All ER (D) 184 (Nov), Dr Alan Sagar was a conscientious doctor who had the misfortune to be falsely accused by a mischievous patient shortly after beginning his training as a General Practitioner (GP). After a year had passed, he was fully exonerated, but the episode triggered a bout of ill-health which significantly affected his GP training. His ill-health was eventually diagnosed and effectively treated, but only after he was removed from his GP training programme by Health Education England (HEE) shortly before he would have fully qualified as a GP.

Dr Sagar mounted a judicial review of HEE’s decision to release him from GP training on two main grounds:

  • A preliminary step (Step 1) had not been undertaken prior to his final appeal hearing (Step 2).
  • Dr Sagar had been handed a 420 page bundle of evidence 10 minutes before
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll