header-logo header-logo

Book review: Banks on Sentence 2022

23 September 2022 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7995 / Categories: Features , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
"In many respects, this publication deserves a tremendous amount of credit for being right at the start, and perhaps the impetus for, the present wealth of quality texts dedicated to ‘sentencing’ as a standalone discipline."
  • Author: Harry O’Sullivan
  • Publisher: LexisNexis Butterworths
  • ISBN: 9781474323017
  • RRP: £159.99


Banks on Sentence is now in its 17th edition and in many respects, this publication deserves a tremendous amount of credit for being right at the start, and perhaps the impetus for, the present wealth of quality texts dedicated to ‘sentencing’ as a standalone discipline.

Over the last two decades, the sentencing exercise in criminal courts has, for better or worse, become a technical and somewhat formulaic application. Gone now are the days when experienced criminal judges can use common sense and experience to pass individual sentences which not only fit the crime, but fit the perpetrator of that crime.

The Sentencing Guidelines Council, as it was once called, began the infiltration of the judge’s role and very soon, ‘guidelines’ became mathematical formulas, which require analysis and application, with the occasional input of case law to remind us that the sentencing process remains in the legal rather than mathematical department.

Sentencing is all about consistency and predictability. It is to be made user friendly, capable of broadcast on television and rigorous enough to survive a ‘red top’ battering.

Enter Banks and all the sons and daughters of Banks.

Divided into two soft back volumes (for those of us who take our law from things we can touch, feel and smell), the first volume tackles the fundamental tools of sentencing from Bind Overs to Serious Terrorism Sentencing, introduced in 2021, the latter providing a most accessible resume of the regime and its application to different age groups.

Banks grapples with the latest developments of sentencing in the context of terrorism related offences with the confidence of a publication which others have since followed. The recognition that sentencing in this modern and dangerous world not only means quantification of time ‘inside’ but also addressing future arrangements for release and monitoring, is expertly nuanced in this latest work. Volume 2 is, as the author informs us, substantially rewritten to take in these important changes, which of course makes the text right up to date.

The easily referenced volumes make for swift and accurate access to the materials, and the criminal offence by criminal offence structure adds to a logical approach to this wide ranging subject. As always, the close proximity of the case law to the starting points, aggravating and mitigating factors, make a full assimilation of all the tools at the advocates disposal both clear and condensed.

As was eloquently put by the Chair of the Commission into the Experience of Victims and Long-Term Prisoners in the preface to that report: ‘It is not just the length of the sentence but the content of the sentence that fulfils the requirements of the judge’s direction for retribution, reduction of crime, deterrence, public protection, reparation and rehabilitation’. Banks goes a long way to helping the courts achieve this difficult but vital balance.

Or as one of my clients once put it when I met him in prison to discuss tariffs: ‘What does Banks say, Mr Cooper?’

Reviewer: Professor John Cooper KC, 25 Bedford Row (www.25bedfordrow.com).

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll