header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 February 2020 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7873 / Categories: Features , Cybercrime
printer mail-detail

Book review: Blockchain, smart contracts, decentralised autonomous organisations and the law

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
15316
Editors: Daniel Kraus, Thierry Obrist, Olivier Hari
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019
ISBN: 978 1 78811 512 4
Pages: 384
RRP: £110

On 18 November 2019 the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce of the Law Delivery Panel delivered a 46-page legal statement concluding that:

  • cryptoassets, including virtual currencies, can in principle be treated as property, and
  • smart contracts are capable of satisfying the requirements of contracts in English law and are thus enforceable by the courts.

This followed the Law Commission’s statement, confirmed by the court in Neocleous v Rees [2019] EWHC 2462 (CH), that statutory requi rements for a signature can be met by electronic means.

Prompted by those significant legal development, practitioners are likely to be looking for reliable and up-to-date information on the relevant technologies and emerging business structures. Professor Daniel Kraus and a team of expert contributors have provided an excellent overview of the key issues, ranging from the practical and legal characteristics of blockchain to the major concerns

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Appeal court reins in ‘wrong defendant’ switcheroo

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
NLJ this week: Mbappé row spotlights ‘ethics bonuses’
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll