header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 February 2020 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7873 / Categories: Features , Cybercrime
printer mail-detail

Book review: Blockchain, smart contracts, decentralised autonomous organisations and the law

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
15316
Editors: Daniel Kraus, Thierry Obrist, Olivier Hari
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019
ISBN: 978 1 78811 512 4
Pages: 384
RRP: £110

On 18 November 2019 the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce of the Law Delivery Panel delivered a 46-page legal statement concluding that:

  • cryptoassets, including virtual currencies, can in principle be treated as property, and
  • smart contracts are capable of satisfying the requirements of contracts in English law and are thus enforceable by the courts.

This followed the Law Commission’s statement, confirmed by the court in Neocleous v Rees [2019] EWHC 2462 (CH), that statutory requi rements for a signature can be met by electronic means.

Prompted by those significant legal development, practitioners are likely to be looking for reliable and up-to-date information on the relevant technologies and emerging business structures. Professor Daniel Kraus and a team of expert contributors have provided an excellent overview of the key issues, ranging from the practical and legal characteristics of blockchain to the major concerns

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Charities Appeals Supplement: March 2026
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll