header-logo header-logo

04 February 2020 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7873 / Categories: Features , Cybercrime
printer mail-detail

Book review: Blockchain, smart contracts, decentralised autonomous organisations and the law

15316
Editors: Daniel Kraus, Thierry Obrist, Olivier Hari
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019
ISBN: 978 1 78811 512 4
Pages: 384
RRP: £110

On 18 November 2019 the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce of the Law Delivery Panel delivered a 46-page legal statement concluding that:

  • cryptoassets, including virtual currencies, can in principle be treated as property, and
  • smart contracts are capable of satisfying the requirements of contracts in English law and are thus enforceable by the courts.

This followed the Law Commission’s statement, confirmed by the court in Neocleous v Rees [2019] EWHC 2462 (CH), that statutory requi rements for a signature can be met by electronic means.

Prompted by those significant legal development, practitioners are likely to be looking for reliable and up-to-date information on the relevant technologies and emerging business structures. Professor Daniel Kraus and a team of expert contributors have provided an excellent overview of the key issues, ranging from the practical and legal characteristics of blockchain to the major concerns

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll