header-logo header-logo

Book review: Inheritance Act Claims: Law and Practice

06 June 2013 / Sarah Aughwane
Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

"The book achieves a good balance between providing an academic review of the law in context & practical advice for contributors"

Author: Sidney Ross
Publisher: Sweet & Maxwell
ISBN: 9780414048515
Price: £190

The latest edition of Ross’s work on Inheritance Act claims follows the same accessible formula as his previous offerings. The opening chapter, dealing with the genesis of the present legislation and case law, is followed by clear and concise consideration of “Persons who may apply”, “Property available for financial provision”, “What the court must consider”, “Orders which the court can make” and “Reasonable financial provision”. A final chapter, giving an insightful guide to practice and procedure in Inheritance Act claims, precedes a number of useful appendices.

Historical departure

In a departure from earlier editions, the history of the legislation is dealt with briefly and by way of an introduction, with less emphasis placed on pre-1975 Act case law. In tracing the “present interaction” between family provision and matrimonial case law back to the 1971 Law Commission report, highlighting the introduction of provision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll