header-logo header-logo

10 September 2021 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7947 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Book review: The Return of Breaking Law: A Judge’s Guide to Your Legal Rights & Winning in Court or Losing Well (2nd Edition)

The golden touch is that this former district judge is a wonderful ‘explainer’

Author: Stephen Gold

Publisher: Bath Publishing

ISBN: 9781838439002

RRP: £25.00


Thanks to a very wealthy benefactor, I have been supplied over the last 18 months with several tomes penned by distinguished lawyers. All have contained a few nuggets of wisdom. A Judge’s Journey by Lord Dyson dished the dirt on lazy judges and how loose talk nearly destroyed a Supreme Court hearing. The diaries of Lord Hope delivered an astonishing insight into the arrival of Lady Hale at the Supreme Court.

However, for those concerned with real legal problems rather than catty gossip, The Return of Breaking Law is the legal publication of the year, again.

Back in 2016, I adored the first edition. We now have an expanded edition which is even more comprehensive. Our new Master of The Rolls, Sir Geoffrey Vos, is a force of nature and a great pragmatist. In a speech a few months ago, he recognised something that many senior judges have missed. Those cases involving charterparties (whatever they are) and reflective loss (me neither) are far removed from the world our citizens inhabit. What really matters are problems that one might actually encounter.

The genius of Stephen Gold is that he recognises those issues. Indeed, he appears to have been in more scrapes than anyone I have ever met. Bad spelling on a Waitrose cake, Marks & Spencer doing strange things with his ISA, broken water filter cartridges, and being overcharged by retailers are just some of the problems he has confronted head on.

His letters of complaint are helpfully reproduced, as are some of the replies seeking to fob him off. Perseverance, we see, inevitably pays off. Precedent letters and claim form content abounds. The heavy lifting is done.

Might I just interject here that, in my experience as a serious shopper, no pricing error has ever been in my favour. Retailers regularly ask if one wants a receipt, to which the only correct answer is yes. One can scrutinise the damage and have evidence of payment. Mr Gold addresses shoplifting allegations at page 492. The topic could usefully be given an entry in the index next time round.

What I find staggering is the scope of this work and the practical advice delivered in plain English. Car parking penalties, inheritance claims, drink driving (a topic of particular personal interest to so many lawyers) and flight delays are here. The golden touch is that this former district judge is a wonderful ‘explainer’. One can see why over the years he has monopolised the airwaves; what is the recipe today Jim?

Disputes between landlords and tenants are escalating as the buy-to-let market roars on and industrious individuals have no choice but to rent. Again, wisdom gushes.

Approximately 100 pages of the 77 chapters deal with relationships. While tricky when the only clients were Adam and Eve, today the landscape is horrific. Prenuptial agreements, cohabitation, marriage, divorce and maintenance are exquisitely explained. ‘No sex please, we’re British’, a farce from 1971, now emerges as chapter 73 for those who want a chaste togetherness.

Those in debt will learn lots about enforcement and bailiffs, although there is no entry in the index for the B word. A review of the index would be a good idea; it is not the responsibility of our author.

Even if you are not in legal trouble (yet), Stephen Gold tells the story of his career in scintillating style. His entry into the legal profession is hilarious. Despite being a former examiner in employment law for the Law Society, I have never seen an obligation imposed upon a trainee or indeed anyone else to ‘cheerfully obey’ the instructions of his principal.

Unlike many a legal expert, Gold practised. To be personal adviser to the Kray twins was an astonishing accolade. Bad service would, I suspect, attract a penalty which the Solicitors Regulation Authority could not impose. Such though was the talent of their solicitor that the boys purchased him an expensive, inscribed watch. I sniggered away at how Ronnie and Reggie charmed the Inland Revenue visitors to their prison. Having arrived in pursuit of loot, they left a few hours later, empty-handed and starstruck by the charm of the duo.

£25 is the cost of this book: that might purchase six minutes of a solicitor’s time. Those who are lawyers such as me and Peter Thompson QC will learn something—perhaps an awful lot—from this magnificent work. Buy it now.

Reviewer: Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School, director of training at Frenkel Topping Group & NLJ columnist (@krug79).

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll