header-logo header-logo

05 June 2019
Issue: 7843 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Boost for UK LawTech

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has committed more than £2m to support new and emerging technologies in the legal sector

The LawTech Delivery Panel, a group of industry experts and members of the government and judiciary, is likely to play a key role in allocating the funding. The panel was established by the Lord Chancellor a year ago to champion the use of technology in the legal sector. It aims to foster innovation, identify and help overcome barriers to growth and provide direction to the legal sector.

Several of the global firms such as Allen & Overy and Clifford Chance have embraced LawTech to the extent of setting up their own technology innovation centres.

Justice secretary David Gauke, said technology ‘promises to be a key component in the success of our legal services sector.

‘We are home to some of the best law firms in the world, globally renowned courts and a wealth of legal talent. Through the effective use of technology, we can help the sector advance and continue to lead globally.

‘More than 200 international firms, from more than 40 jurisdictions, have chosen to base themselves here and English and Welsh law is the most commonly used in international business and dispute resolution.’

In 2017, the UK legal sector was worth about £25bn to the economy and employed more than 300,000 people. It is the second largest legal services market in the world. The LawTech sector was valued at $15.9bn globally in 2018, the MoJ said.

Welcoming the announcement, Christina Blacklaws, Law Society president and chair of the LawTech Delivery Panel, said: ‘There has been an exponential growth of technology in the financial services industry in recent years, thanks in no small part to government support.

‘Last year, job creation increased in London by 61%―and nearly a fifth in the country as a whole. This initiative will help the UK to become a world leader in legal technology―with all of the economic benefits that follow.’

Issue: 7843 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll