header-logo header-logo

05 June 2019
Issue: 7843 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Boost for UK LawTech

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has committed more than £2m to support new and emerging technologies in the legal sector

The LawTech Delivery Panel, a group of industry experts and members of the government and judiciary, is likely to play a key role in allocating the funding. The panel was established by the Lord Chancellor a year ago to champion the use of technology in the legal sector. It aims to foster innovation, identify and help overcome barriers to growth and provide direction to the legal sector.

Several of the global firms such as Allen & Overy and Clifford Chance have embraced LawTech to the extent of setting up their own technology innovation centres.

Justice secretary David Gauke, said technology ‘promises to be a key component in the success of our legal services sector.

‘We are home to some of the best law firms in the world, globally renowned courts and a wealth of legal talent. Through the effective use of technology, we can help the sector advance and continue to lead globally.

‘More than 200 international firms, from more than 40 jurisdictions, have chosen to base themselves here and English and Welsh law is the most commonly used in international business and dispute resolution.’

In 2017, the UK legal sector was worth about £25bn to the economy and employed more than 300,000 people. It is the second largest legal services market in the world. The LawTech sector was valued at $15.9bn globally in 2018, the MoJ said.

Welcoming the announcement, Christina Blacklaws, Law Society president and chair of the LawTech Delivery Panel, said: ‘There has been an exponential growth of technology in the financial services industry in recent years, thanks in no small part to government support.

‘Last year, job creation increased in London by 61%―and nearly a fifth in the country as a whole. This initiative will help the UK to become a world leader in legal technology―with all of the economic benefits that follow.’

Issue: 7843 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll