header-logo header-logo

07 February 2008 / Adrian Berry , Hina Majid
Issue: 7307 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Border Trouble

Adrian Berry and Hina Majid unravel the UK Borders Act

The UK Borders Act 2007 (UKBA 2007) takes forward the government’s five-year plan for immigration and asylum, but perhaps more broadly represents its political response to the recent foreign national prisoners’ scandal and successive headlines about illegal immigration. UKBA 2007 received Royal Assent on 30 October 2007.
At the time of writing, ss 1–8, 10–11, 13–18, 20, 22, 23 and 26, 29–31 and 40–43, together with the relevant schedule, have been brought into force through the UK Borders Act 2007 (Commencement No 1 and Transitional Provisions) Order (SI 2008/99) and the Asylum Support (Prescribed Period following Appeal) Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/3102). It should, however, be noted that some of these provisions are only partially in force, while others are subject to transitional provisions. UKBA 2007 is split into seven parts, the key aspects of which are outlined below.

POWERS TO DETAIN AT PORTS: SS 1-4
UKBA 2007 creates “designated” immigration officers and an accompanying power to detain individuals, including British citizens.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll