header-logo header-logo

04 September 2008 / Brent Mcdonald
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Bouncing & bouldering

Brent McDonald discusses recent cases involving negligence and statutory duty

In Poppleton v Trustees of the Portsmouth Youth Activities Committee [2008] EWCA Civ 646, [2008] All ER (D) 150 (Jun) the Court of Appeal was asked to consider a case where the claimant, Mr Poppleton, had suffered an injury at the defendant's activity centre.

Poppleton attended an activity centre on 12 February 2002 with a group of friends to engage in an activity known as “bouldering”. Bouldering is a low level simulated rock climbing activity.

The claimant was a relatively inexperienced climber although he had used this particular bouldering wall three or four times before. The defendant did not show him any rules or ask him to sign a disclaimer notice, nor did it give him any instruction as to the risks of this activity. It made no enquiries as to his ability as a climber. The experts agreed that the rules prohibiting jumping off the walls and climbing on top of the structure should have been more prominently displayed.

Having seen a friend

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll