header-logo header-logo

30 September 2010 / Keeley Ellaway
Issue: 7435 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

A brave new world

Leases have moved on. It’s the market that needs to catch up, says Keeley Ellaway

In their recent NLJ article, Richard Castle and John Castle lamented the lack of progress in lease development calling for leases to be “brought into the 20th century before too much of the 21st goes by” (NLJ, 30 July 2010, p 1068-69). Clearlet, a new form of lease written in plain English, goes some way to address this challenge.

Clearlet was devised by Nabarro and developed for one of its major landlord clients by the clients’ legal panel of Nabarro, Eversheds and Dundas & Wilson. Clearlet reflects a modern approach to leasing and is indicative of a move away from the historic adversarial position between landlord and tenant to that of a partnership where the parties work collaboratively to achieve a mutually beneficial document.

The idea behind Clearlet

The idea for Clearlet was put forward before current challenging economic times. In these conditions, the adoption of a Clearlet approach has become a necessity rather than a nicety, with many firms acknowledging that they cannot simply

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll