header-logo header-logo

25 January 2007
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A brave new world at the Home Office?

News

Speculation is mounting that the Home Office is to be split into separate justice and public protection functions.

Home Secretary John Reid, who declared the department “not fit for purpose” on taking office in May last year, has dropped several hints that radical change may be necessary. Reid’s reform plans are due to be debated by the cabinet next month, according to the BBC, and they are already provoking discussion among crime and immigration law specialists.
Paul Cavadino, chief executive of crime reduction charity Nacro, say there could be advantages in creating a separate justice ministry. “A Ministry of Justice could concentrate on reducing crime and running an effective penal system without being diverted by constant crises in security and immigration policy.

“There would also be an advantage in having two separate departmental budgets. For example, if the government suddenly decided to switch more resources into the immigration detention system, this would no longer put other parts of the Home Office budget at immediate risk,” he says.
Immigration barrister Doron Blum, of 1 Pump Court Chambers, says: “The Home Office is under-resourced, under-staffed and over-stretched. My hope for these plans would be that it means more resources.

“A few months ago, there were no presenting officers representing the Home Office in a quarter of cases at the [immigration] tribunal. People were leaving because of low pay. If it means there will be more resources and people will stay on so that presenting officers become more experienced then that is good. “My fear is it could lead to more bureaucracy. Things get lost in the Home Office as it is.”

However, the Home Office denies that plans to split the department into its separate functions exist. A spokesperson says: “No such proposal has been made. The Home Secretary has put in place a plan for the reform and transformation of the Home Office, and that is composed of three separate reviews into the Immigration and Nationality Directorate, the criminal justice system and security capabilities.”

Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll