header-logo header-logo

25 January 2007
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A brave new world at the Home Office?

News

Speculation is mounting that the Home Office is to be split into separate justice and public protection functions.

Home Secretary John Reid, who declared the department “not fit for purpose” on taking office in May last year, has dropped several hints that radical change may be necessary. Reid’s reform plans are due to be debated by the cabinet next month, according to the BBC, and they are already provoking discussion among crime and immigration law specialists.
Paul Cavadino, chief executive of crime reduction charity Nacro, say there could be advantages in creating a separate justice ministry. “A Ministry of Justice could concentrate on reducing crime and running an effective penal system without being diverted by constant crises in security and immigration policy.

“There would also be an advantage in having two separate departmental budgets. For example, if the government suddenly decided to switch more resources into the immigration detention system, this would no longer put other parts of the Home Office budget at immediate risk,” he says.
Immigration barrister Doron Blum, of 1 Pump Court Chambers, says: “The Home Office is under-resourced, under-staffed and over-stretched. My hope for these plans would be that it means more resources.

“A few months ago, there were no presenting officers representing the Home Office in a quarter of cases at the [immigration] tribunal. People were leaving because of low pay. If it means there will be more resources and people will stay on so that presenting officers become more experienced then that is good. “My fear is it could lead to more bureaucracy. Things get lost in the Home Office as it is.”

However, the Home Office denies that plans to split the department into its separate functions exist. A spokesperson says: “No such proposal has been made. The Home Secretary has put in place a plan for the reform and transformation of the Home Office, and that is composed of three separate reviews into the Immigration and Nationality Directorate, the criminal justice system and security capabilities.”

Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll