header-logo header-logo

01 February 2023
Issue: 8011 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Contempt
printer mail-detail

Breach of judgment embargo

A US deputy general counsel who breached the embargo on disclosure of draft judgments has escaped contempt proceedings.

While Lord Justice Warby acknowledged there was an argument that strict liability might apply, he chose to take no action since ‘further proceedings would be disproportionate to any need to uphold the court's authority’, in InterDigital Technology v Lenovo [2023] EWCA Civ 57. Lord Justice Birss and Lady Justice Falk agreed.

InterDigital counsel Steve Akerley, on holiday at the time, read the draft judgment on a mobile device and disclosed the outcome to the company’s US law firm under the heading ‘confidential’. 

The email was then forwarded to five team members, one of whom congratulated InterDigital’s solicitor Gowling partner Alexandra Brodie, who immediately replied: 'Thank you but unfortunately that is a breach of the embargo. Who else did he tell?'

Last February, Sir Geoffrey Vos MR warned that those who breach embargoes should expect to face contempt proceedings, in R (on the application of Counsel General for Wales) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2022] EWCA Civ 181.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll