header-logo header-logo

Breach of judgment embargo

01 February 2023
Issue: 8011 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Contempt
printer mail-detail
A US deputy general counsel who breached the embargo on disclosure of draft judgments has escaped contempt proceedings.

While Lord Justice Warby acknowledged there was an argument that strict liability might apply, he chose to take no action since ‘further proceedings would be disproportionate to any need to uphold the court's authority’, in InterDigital Technology v Lenovo [2023] EWCA Civ 57. Lord Justice Birss and Lady Justice Falk agreed.

InterDigital counsel Steve Akerley, on holiday at the time, read the draft judgment on a mobile device and disclosed the outcome to the company’s US law firm under the heading ‘confidential’. 

The email was then forwarded to five team members, one of whom congratulated InterDigital’s solicitor Gowling partner Alexandra Brodie, who immediately replied: 'Thank you but unfortunately that is a breach of the embargo. Who else did he tell?'

Last February, Sir Geoffrey Vos MR warned that those who breach embargoes should expect to face contempt proceedings, in R (on the application of Counsel General for Wales) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2022] EWCA Civ 181.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll