header-logo header-logo

01 February 2023
Issue: 8011 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Contempt
printer mail-detail

Breach of judgment embargo

A US deputy general counsel who breached the embargo on disclosure of draft judgments has escaped contempt proceedings.

While Lord Justice Warby acknowledged there was an argument that strict liability might apply, he chose to take no action since ‘further proceedings would be disproportionate to any need to uphold the court's authority’, in InterDigital Technology v Lenovo [2023] EWCA Civ 57. Lord Justice Birss and Lady Justice Falk agreed.

InterDigital counsel Steve Akerley, on holiday at the time, read the draft judgment on a mobile device and disclosed the outcome to the company’s US law firm under the heading ‘confidential’. 

The email was then forwarded to five team members, one of whom congratulated InterDigital’s solicitor Gowling partner Alexandra Brodie, who immediately replied: 'Thank you but unfortunately that is a breach of the embargo. Who else did he tell?'

Last February, Sir Geoffrey Vos MR warned that those who breach embargoes should expect to face contempt proceedings, in R (on the application of Counsel General for Wales) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2022] EWCA Civ 181.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll