header-logo header-logo

Breaking the mould

03 June 2010 / Caroline Wright , Nigel Dyer KC
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail
family_4

Caroline Wright & Nigel Dyer QC consider how Agbaje will affect the divorce courts at home & abroad

Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (Pt III) has been on the statute books for over 25 years. Its purpose was to give the English courts the power to alleviate hardship where no or inadequate financial orders were made after a foreign divorce where the parties have substantial connections with England (Law Commission Working Paper 1982). The number of families with a substantial connection to more than one jurisdiction has increased steadily in that time yet until now Pt III has been little used and relatively untested. Indeed, most of the Court of Appeal cases have been concerned with whether leave to apply under the Act should be set aside, rather than with appeals arising from substantive hearings.

Arguably, previous jurisprudence is now irrelevant following Agbaje v Akinnoye-Agbaje [2010] UKSC 13, [2010] All ER (D) 92 (Mar). It is the first time Pt III has been considered

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll