header-logo header-logo

Breaking the mould

03 June 2010 / Caroline Wright , Nigel Dyer KC
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail
family_4

Caroline Wright & Nigel Dyer QC consider how Agbaje will affect the divorce courts at home & abroad

Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (Pt III) has been on the statute books for over 25 years. Its purpose was to give the English courts the power to alleviate hardship where no or inadequate financial orders were made after a foreign divorce where the parties have substantial connections with England (Law Commission Working Paper 1982). The number of families with a substantial connection to more than one jurisdiction has increased steadily in that time yet until now Pt III has been little used and relatively untested. Indeed, most of the Court of Appeal cases have been concerned with whether leave to apply under the Act should be set aside, rather than with appeals arising from substantive hearings.

Arguably, previous jurisprudence is now irrelevant following Agbaje v Akinnoye-Agbaje [2010] UKSC 13, [2010] All ER (D) 92 (Mar). It is the first time Pt III has been considered

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll