header-logo header-logo

03 June 2010 / Caroline Wright , Nigel Dyer KC
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Breaking the mould

family_4

Caroline Wright & Nigel Dyer QC consider how Agbaje will affect the divorce courts at home & abroad

Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (Pt III) has been on the statute books for over 25 years. Its purpose was to give the English courts the power to alleviate hardship where no or inadequate financial orders were made after a foreign divorce where the parties have substantial connections with England (Law Commission Working Paper 1982). The number of families with a substantial connection to more than one jurisdiction has increased steadily in that time yet until now Pt III has been little used and relatively untested. Indeed, most of the Court of Appeal cases have been concerned with whether leave to apply under the Act should be set aside, rather than with appeals arising from substantive hearings.

Arguably, previous jurisprudence is now irrelevant following Agbaje v Akinnoye-Agbaje [2010] UKSC 13, [2010] All ER (D) 92 (Mar). It is the first time Pt III has been considered

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll