header-logo header-logo

Breaking the mould

03 June 2010 / Caroline Wright , Nigel Dyer KC
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail
family_4

Caroline Wright & Nigel Dyer QC consider how Agbaje will affect the divorce courts at home & abroad

Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (Pt III) has been on the statute books for over 25 years. Its purpose was to give the English courts the power to alleviate hardship where no or inadequate financial orders were made after a foreign divorce where the parties have substantial connections with England (Law Commission Working Paper 1982). The number of families with a substantial connection to more than one jurisdiction has increased steadily in that time yet until now Pt III has been little used and relatively untested. Indeed, most of the Court of Appeal cases have been concerned with whether leave to apply under the Act should be set aside, rather than with appeals arising from substantive hearings.

Arguably, previous jurisprudence is now irrelevant following Agbaje v Akinnoye-Agbaje [2010] UKSC 13, [2010] All ER (D) 92 (Mar). It is the first time Pt III has been considered

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll