header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 July 2010 / Nick Knapman
Issue: 7424 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Breaking news

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Nick Knapman discusses break notices—a topic likely to get property solicitors’ hearts racing

Few tasks place a property solicitor more on edge than the preparation and service of a break notice to determine a lease. Despite Lord Hoffmann’s landmark judgment in the 1997 Mannai decision and his “reasonable recipient” test, cases continue to reach the courts on the validity of notices served Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd [1997] AC 749, [1997] 3 All ER 352).

Preparation

For a tenant break option to be validly exercised when giving notice, the legal tenant or its agents/solicitors must give the notice. The deeds, the Land Registry, recent rent demands and Companies House must therefore be checked to ensure that the notice is given by the current lawful tenant or tenants.
In Prudential Assurance v Exel UK Limited and another [2009] EWHC 1350 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 122 (Sep) the relevant lease was held by two companies in the same group, one active and trading (Exel), the other dormant (Consumer).

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll