header-logo header-logo

Brexit behind the headlines

08 September 2017
Issue: 7760 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail
nlj_7760_greene_0

Position papers restate mantra that CJEU will have no direct jurisdiction post Brexit

The government’s latest position papers on Brexit hint at retaining the status quo, according to Brexit commentator David Greene.

Press headlines suggested a ‘climbdown’ on the government’s position that the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (CJEU) would end upon Brexit, following the publication in August of the UK’s position papers: ‘Providing a cross-border civil judicial co-operation framework’ and ‘Enforcement and dispute resolution’.

Writing this week, however, Greene, NLJ consultant editor, says: ‘Have they forced a government climbdown? Not quite: both papers restate the mantra that upon withdrawal the CJEU will no longer have direct jurisdiction in the UK.

‘That keeps the politicians happy, but, subject to that point, both papers smack of retaining, as far as possible, the status quo in the longer term.’

Greene says Brexit will have an impact at three main levels—government level, investor level and at the level of day to day business and citizens’ rights.

At government level, the UK position has been that the CJEU will have no continuing role although its pre-Brexit rulings will have binding effect. The EU’s position is that the CJEU must have a continuing role in the process as a result of the EU Treaties. However, ‘the new UK paper now talks of the possibility of voluntary references to the CJEU for interpretation only,’ says Greene. ‘It rejects the idea that the CJEU should be entitled to impose any remedies.’

On the rights of investors, whether small businesses or multinationals, Greene says ‘the likelihood is that they will be the subject of an ICSD arbitration process.

‘These arbitration processes remain highly contentious and bearing in mind the level of trade would need to be very well resourced, the UK does not foresee any role for the CJEU in that area. The EU position is unclear but the role of the CJEU gives rise to complexities in this area under the EU Treaties.’

On citizens’ cross-border rights, the EU and UK are at odds. The EU sees the CJEU having a role in determination of those on a permanent basis, says Greene. 

Issue: 7760 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll