header-logo header-logo

Brexit notices on ‘no deal’

14 September 2018
Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

The government has released a second batch of technical notices on a ‘no deal’ scenario, including notes on civil judicial co-operation.

The 28 notices, published this week, reveal that free mobile phone roaming may no longer be guaranteed, that a UK driving licence may not be valid in the EU and that transferring personal data from the UK to a EU Member State may breach data protection laws after the UK leaves in March 2019.

On civil justice, the notices reiterate that the government will apply to re-join the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements 2005, which would come into force by 1 April 2019.

David Mundy, partner and Parliamentary agent at Bircham Dyson Bell, said: ‘The reality of the impact of a “no deal” Brexit on the most basic free movement rights we take for granted is brought home by one the government’s “no deal” guidance notes—UK driving licences would be invalid and drivers will require an International Driving Permit. Without one you could be fined or even turned away at the border.

‘In another area crucial for business-free movement of data, the government has indicated the UK would at the point of exit continue to allow the free flow of personal data from the UK to the EU. This is based on the idea that the EU has adequate safeguards for its proper treatment of data. By contrast, however, the European Commission has indicated that a decision on adequacy of the UK’s arrangements cannot be taken until the UK is a third country outside the EU. The guidance therefore advises businesses looking to receive personal data from organisations in the EU need to establish the legal basis of those transfers.

‘Neither of these scenarios seems remotely satisfactory. In short the government is challenging the EU and its rebel hard Brexiteers—highlighting that the only way to avoid “this shambles” is to back the Chequers compromise.’

Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll