header-logo header-logo

Brexit & retained devolved EU law

16 May 2019 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 7840 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Simon Parsons reports on another constitutional crisis which could be brewing after Brexit

  • In 2018, the Supreme Court ruled that the passing of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 prevented the Scottish government enacting its own legislation to close post-Brexit gaps in the law.
  • This judgment confirmed Westminster’s unrestrained legislative competence throughout the UK and the devolved legislatures are subordinate to it.
  •  

    In 2018, the Welsh government and the Scottish government issued the Law Derived from the European Union (Wales) Bill and the UK Withdrawal from the European Union (Legal Continuity) (Scotland) Bill respectively, the purpose of which was the same as Westminster’s EU Withdrawal Bill; ie to convert or transpose directly applicable EU law relating to Wales and Scotland into Scottish and Welsh domestic law, and by preserving the Welsh and Scottish legislation that implements EU law which is not directly applicable. The aim was to avoid legislative gaps in the law after Brexit. This is known as retained devolved EU law. The subordinate legislatures issued

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    DWF—19 appointments

    DWF—19 appointments

    Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

    Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

    Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

    Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

    Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

    Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

    Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

    NEWS
    Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
    The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
    Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
    Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
    Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
    back-to-top-scroll