header-logo header-logo

Brexit & retained devolved EU law

16 May 2019 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 7840 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Simon Parsons reports on another constitutional crisis which could be brewing after Brexit

  • In 2018, the Supreme Court ruled that the passing of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 prevented the Scottish government enacting its own legislation to close post-Brexit gaps in the law.
  • This judgment confirmed Westminster’s unrestrained legislative competence throughout the UK and the devolved legislatures are subordinate to it.
  •  

    In 2018, the Welsh government and the Scottish government issued the Law Derived from the European Union (Wales) Bill and the UK Withdrawal from the European Union (Legal Continuity) (Scotland) Bill respectively, the purpose of which was the same as Westminster’s EU Withdrawal Bill; ie to convert or transpose directly applicable EU law relating to Wales and Scotland into Scottish and Welsh domestic law, and by preserving the Welsh and Scottish legislation that implements EU law which is not directly applicable. The aim was to avoid legislative gaps in the law after Brexit. This is known as retained devolved EU law. The subordinate legislatures issued

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

    CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

    Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

    Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

    Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

    Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

    Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

    Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

    Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

    NEWS
    The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
    In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
    Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
    James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
    Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
    back-to-top-scroll