header-logo header-logo

29 June 2016 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7705 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Brexit: what rights do we have?

What now for human rights in the UK post-Brexit, asks Jon Robins

Theresa May, expected to shortly emerge as the “stop Boris” prime ministerial candidate in this post-referendum world, kept her head down during the Brexit campaign apart from one notable intervention.

While it was the economy, sovereignty and increasingly immigration that dominated debate over the last few weeks, the home secretary explained that she wanted to “remain” while getting the hell out of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The convention, she insisted, added “nothing to our prosperity, makes us less secure by preventing the deportation of dangerous foreign nationals—and does nothing to change the attitudes of governments like Russia’s when it comes to human rights”.  

Laying out her stall, Theresa May went on to say: “This is Great Britain—the country of Magna Carta, parliamentary democracy and the fairest courts in the world—and we can protect human rights ourselves in a way that doesn’t jeopardise national security or bind the hands of Parliament.”

The minister once famously

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll