header-logo header-logo

29 June 2016 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7705 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Brexit: what rights do we have?

What now for human rights in the UK post-Brexit, asks Jon Robins

Theresa May, expected to shortly emerge as the “stop Boris” prime ministerial candidate in this post-referendum world, kept her head down during the Brexit campaign apart from one notable intervention.

While it was the economy, sovereignty and increasingly immigration that dominated debate over the last few weeks, the home secretary explained that she wanted to “remain” while getting the hell out of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The convention, she insisted, added “nothing to our prosperity, makes us less secure by preventing the deportation of dangerous foreign nationals—and does nothing to change the attitudes of governments like Russia’s when it comes to human rights”.  

Laying out her stall, Theresa May went on to say: “This is Great Britain—the country of Magna Carta, parliamentary democracy and the fairest courts in the world—and we can protect human rights ourselves in a way that doesn’t jeopardise national security or bind the hands of Parliament.”

The minister once famously

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll