header-logo header-logo

01 July 2011
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Bribery Act now in force

The Bribery Act 2010 came into force today (1 July), introducing tough new laws that could see businesses prosecuted for failing to prevent bribery

Individuals who pay or accept bribes risk a prison sentence of up to 10 years, while businesses who fail to prevent the practice by their employees or any "associated person" commit a corporate offence and could face large fines.

It is a defence if the company can show it has "adequate procedures" in place.

Both the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and the Serious Fraud Office have published guidance on the Act.

Nick Benwell, partner in charge of crime, fraud and investigations at Simmons & Simmons, said: “In practice, a lot of the impact of the Act is going to be felt as companies increasingly require assurances from their suppliers about the suppliers' anti-bribery compliance procedures.

“Although there is no grace period under the Act, the MoJ Guidance does at least recognise that applying anti-corruption procedures retrospectively is more difficult, but this should be done ‘over time, adopting a risk based approach’.”

New Law Journal hosted a top level roundtable discussion on the implications and enforcement of the new Act today, chaired by David Greene, NLJ consultant editor, senior partner & head of the litigation & dispute resolution team at Edwin Coe. A report of the discussion will be published in a forthcoming issue.

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll