header-logo header-logo

20 November 2014 / Sarah Taylor
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Opinion , Child law
printer mail-detail

Bringing them home

taylor

Sarah Taylor explains why the Law Commission is recommending changes to the law of child abduction

The Law Commission’s report, Simplification of the Criminal law: Kidnapping and related offences, was published yesterday (20 November 2014). The report recommends the creation of new statutory offences of kidnapping and unlawful detention to replace the common law in this area. The Commission also recommends changes to the law of child abduction, and that aspect of the report is the focus of this article.

The current law

There are two child abduction offences under the Child Abduction Act 1984 (CAA 1984).

  • First, s 1, child abduction by parents (or connected persons), committed by taking or sending a child out of the UK without the appropriate consent.
  • Second, s 2, child abduction by other persons, by taking or detaining a child from persons with lawful control of the child.

Accordingly, s 1 does not apply where a parent takes a child outside the UK with appropriate consent but retains the child beyond the period for which permission

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll