header-logo header-logo

Bringing them home

20 November 2014 / Sarah Taylor
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Opinion , Child law
printer mail-detail
taylor

Sarah Taylor explains why the Law Commission is recommending changes to the law of child abduction

The Law Commission’s report, Simplification of the Criminal law: Kidnapping and related offences, was published yesterday (20 November 2014). The report recommends the creation of new statutory offences of kidnapping and unlawful detention to replace the common law in this area. The Commission also recommends changes to the law of child abduction, and that aspect of the report is the focus of this article.

The current law

There are two child abduction offences under the Child Abduction Act 1984 (CAA 1984).

  • First, s 1, child abduction by parents (or connected persons), committed by taking or sending a child out of the UK without the appropriate consent.
  • Second, s 2, child abduction by other persons, by taking or detaining a child from persons with lawful control of the child.

Accordingly, s 1 does not apply where a parent takes a child outside the UK with appropriate consent but retains the child beyond the period for which permission

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
back-to-top-scroll