header-logo header-logo

BSB seeks to help chambers in distress

14 May 2015
Issue: 7652 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) is seeking new statutory powers to step into barristers’ failing chambers, companies and partnerships to protect clients when things go seriously wrong.

In a consultation paper launched this week, the BSB argues for the right to take control of client files in serious instances of regulatory non-compliance, dishonesty, insolvency or in other instances where the client’s interests require protection. This would give the BSB powers to take action such as obtaining alternative representation for clients and securing any papers and assets that belong to them.

Barristers could also be asked to pay into a compensation fund in future—while the BSB does not believe this is necessary at present, the market and its risks may change.

Ewen Macleod, director of regulatory policy for the BSB, says: “To be clear: these are powers that would be used very rarely, but we think that, in the event something goes awry, all clients should benefit from the same safeguards—regardless of whether they’re the client of an ABS, a BSB-regulated entity, or a barristers’ chambers.

“Other regulators already have similar controls so we want to ensure there are no holes in the safety net for consumers. For us, having these powers available, if and when we need them, is key to protecting the public interest and upholding the Regulatory Objectives set out in the Legal Services Act.”

Currently, the BSB’s controls exist by means of contract. The consultation also proposes putting many of the BSB’s existing regulatory powers on a statutory footing.

Issue: 7652 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll