header-logo header-logo

BSB seeks to help chambers in distress

14 May 2015
Issue: 7652 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) is seeking new statutory powers to step into barristers’ failing chambers, companies and partnerships to protect clients when things go seriously wrong.

In a consultation paper launched this week, the BSB argues for the right to take control of client files in serious instances of regulatory non-compliance, dishonesty, insolvency or in other instances where the client’s interests require protection. This would give the BSB powers to take action such as obtaining alternative representation for clients and securing any papers and assets that belong to them.

Barristers could also be asked to pay into a compensation fund in future—while the BSB does not believe this is necessary at present, the market and its risks may change.

Ewen Macleod, director of regulatory policy for the BSB, says: “To be clear: these are powers that would be used very rarely, but we think that, in the event something goes awry, all clients should benefit from the same safeguards—regardless of whether they’re the client of an ABS, a BSB-regulated entity, or a barristers’ chambers.

“Other regulators already have similar controls so we want to ensure there are no holes in the safety net for consumers. For us, having these powers available, if and when we need them, is key to protecting the public interest and upholding the Regulatory Objectives set out in the Legal Services Act.”

Currently, the BSB’s controls exist by means of contract. The consultation also proposes putting many of the BSB’s existing regulatory powers on a statutory footing.

Issue: 7652 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll