header-logo header-logo

BSB seeks to help chambers in distress

14 May 2015
Issue: 7652 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) is seeking new statutory powers to step into barristers’ failing chambers, companies and partnerships to protect clients when things go seriously wrong.

In a consultation paper launched this week, the BSB argues for the right to take control of client files in serious instances of regulatory non-compliance, dishonesty, insolvency or in other instances where the client’s interests require protection. This would give the BSB powers to take action such as obtaining alternative representation for clients and securing any papers and assets that belong to them.

Barristers could also be asked to pay into a compensation fund in future—while the BSB does not believe this is necessary at present, the market and its risks may change.

Ewen Macleod, director of regulatory policy for the BSB, says: “To be clear: these are powers that would be used very rarely, but we think that, in the event something goes awry, all clients should benefit from the same safeguards—regardless of whether they’re the client of an ABS, a BSB-regulated entity, or a barristers’ chambers.

“Other regulators already have similar controls so we want to ensure there are no holes in the safety net for consumers. For us, having these powers available, if and when we need them, is key to protecting the public interest and upholding the Regulatory Objectives set out in the Legal Services Act.”

Currently, the BSB’s controls exist by means of contract. The consultation also proposes putting many of the BSB’s existing regulatory powers on a statutory footing.

Issue: 7652 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll