header-logo header-logo

11 May 2022
Issue: 7978 / Categories: Legal News , Collective action
printer mail-detail

BT opt-out appeal fails

The Court of Appeal has unanimously rejected BT’s argument that a collective proceedings order (CPO) should be ‘opt-in’, in a mass action claiming it abused its dominant market position by charging excessive landline prices

Delivering the court’s judgment in BT Group Plc v Patourel [2022] EWCA Civ 593, Lord Justice Green said ‘the power to order opt-in or opt-out proceedings is one for the tribunal to make upon the basis of all the circumstances of the case. There is no prior legislative predisposition one way or another’. He said the financial position of parties and ability to attract third-party funding was ‘relevant to access to justice and is a factor the CAT should necessarily take into account’.

The Competition Appeal Tribunal granted a CPO on an opt-out basis last year, meaning potential claimants are automatically included.

Issue: 7978 / Categories: Legal News , Collective action
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll