header-logo header-logo

11 May 2022
Issue: 7978 / Categories: Legal News , Collective action
printer mail-detail

BT opt-out appeal fails

The Court of Appeal has unanimously rejected BT’s argument that a collective proceedings order (CPO) should be ‘opt-in’, in a mass action claiming it abused its dominant market position by charging excessive landline prices

Delivering the court’s judgment in BT Group Plc v Patourel [2022] EWCA Civ 593, Lord Justice Green said ‘the power to order opt-in or opt-out proceedings is one for the tribunal to make upon the basis of all the circumstances of the case. There is no prior legislative predisposition one way or another’. He said the financial position of parties and ability to attract third-party funding was ‘relevant to access to justice and is a factor the CAT should necessarily take into account’.

The Competition Appeal Tribunal granted a CPO on an opt-out basis last year, meaning potential claimants are automatically included.

Issue: 7978 / Categories: Legal News , Collective action
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll