header-logo header-logo

Budget "stealth" tax could see PII payments rise

13 July 2015
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Insurance experts are encouraging law firms to take particular note of the proposed rise in insurance premium tax (IPT) announced in last week’s summer budget.

Nick Paterno, managing partner of McBrides Chartered Accountants, and lead adviser to McBrides legal sector clients says: “Some [law] practices may be forgiven for missing the Chancellor’s ‘stealth tax’ this year in the form of a rise in IPT from 6% to 9.5%. This 58% increase is costly to most businesses but in the legal sector the impact on professional indemnity premiums will be significant.”

For firms renewing insurance this October Legal Risk partner Frank Maher says that it could be worth considering a longer policy period to beat the tax hike. “Eighteen-month policies are generally available, and carry the added bonus of broad cover for a longer period before the dramatic cuts proposed in the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA’s) consultation can take effect.”

The SRA’s discussion paper, "Protecting client’s financial interests", published earlier this month sets out a number of possible options for reforming professional indemnity insurance (PII) arrangements. More detailed proposals will follow in a further consultation in early 2016. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll