header-logo header-logo

Budget "stealth" tax could see PII payments rise

13 July 2015
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Insurance experts are encouraging law firms to take particular note of the proposed rise in insurance premium tax (IPT) announced in last week’s summer budget.

Nick Paterno, managing partner of McBrides Chartered Accountants, and lead adviser to McBrides legal sector clients says: “Some [law] practices may be forgiven for missing the Chancellor’s ‘stealth tax’ this year in the form of a rise in IPT from 6% to 9.5%. This 58% increase is costly to most businesses but in the legal sector the impact on professional indemnity premiums will be significant.”

For firms renewing insurance this October Legal Risk partner Frank Maher says that it could be worth considering a longer policy period to beat the tax hike. “Eighteen-month policies are generally available, and carry the added bonus of broad cover for a longer period before the dramatic cuts proposed in the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA’s) consultation can take effect.”

The SRA’s discussion paper, "Protecting client’s financial interests", published earlier this month sets out a number of possible options for reforming professional indemnity insurance (PII) arrangements. More detailed proposals will follow in a further consultation in early 2016. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll