header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
26 September 2014 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7623 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR
printer mail-detail

Building bridges

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
burns_mediation

Courts are taking a positive step towards supporting mediation, says Martin Burns

In England and Wales the rules which regulate the civil litigation process, (the Civil Procedure Rules) encourage use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), and actually impose obligations on the courts to assess the extent to which parties try to avoid ending up in court by using ADR.

Method of choice

Mediation has become the ADR method of choice for many people, and it can be very effective. It is essentially a structured negotiation, facilitated by an impartial mediator. It is often categorised as a process, which involves parties putting their cases to each other via a mediator, and through him or her, seeking an amicable resolution to their dispute.

I think of mediation, not as a process, but as a collection of techniques. Some, or all, of these techniques can be employed by an independent mediator to get disputing parties out of entrenched positions and re-focused on finding their own solutions to their particular problems. Whatever way you describe mediation, it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll