header-logo header-logo

06 March 2008 / Julian Samiloff
Issue: 7311 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

The bulwark of liberty

Will someone rid me of this meddlestone jury?Now the coroner's jury is under attack, says Julian Samiloff

In the matter of the importance of juries, I tend to side with Sir Patrick Devlin’s comment that “the first object of any tyrant in Whitehall would be to make Parliament utterly subservient to his will; and the next would be to overthrow or diminish trial by jury, for no tyrant could afford to leave a subject’s freedom in the hands of twelve of his countrymen. So that trial by jury is more than an instrument of justice and more than one wheel of the constitution: it is the lamp that shows that freedom lives” (Trial by Jury, 3rd Edn 1966). The lord chief justice in Bushell’s Case 124 Eng Rep 1006 stated that the jury was “the bulwark of liberty”.

 

CORONER’S JURIES

Since 1927 a coroner’s jury has only been necessary in a minority of inquests. Juries are currently required under the Coroners Act 1988, s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll