header-logo header-logo

23 September 2010
Issue: 7434 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Business confidence rises across Legal UK

City optimistic but mood of apprehension remains

Confidence about the future is running high in the City, but regional law firms remain cautious, according to Smith & Williamson research.

The firm found that three-quarters of London’s law firms—but only half of regional firms—say they are optimistic about the year ahead. This is an increase overall on last year, when just over half of all law firms claimed a positive outlook on business prospects.

Medium and smaller firms are most concerned about the economy, while pressure on fees and recruitment and retention are the main concerns for larger firms.
 
“What we are seeing is a steady but cautious return of confidence, as firms’ management is still affected by the sudden and severe nature of the recession,” says Giles Murphy, head of the professional practices group at Smith & Williamson.

“Competition for work is still reported to be high, but fewer respondents are worried by a fall in demand for their services (down from 30% last year to 15% this year). And while cash flow issues are still providing difficulties for 25% of firms overall, last year 40% reported cash flow problems.”

More than a third of larger firms have made, or are making, a capital call on partners. Only 15% of medium and smaller firms have made the decision to do this.

While 29% of larger firms have decided to retain more funds within the business, 42% of medium and smaller firms have done so.

“Few firms have been immune to recent financial pressures and many have looked to boost their balance sheet,” says Murphy.

“Larger practices appear to favour seeking capital injections from their partners. By contrast, the medium and smaller practices, who cite cash flow as one of their top five issues have looked to pay less of the profits they earn to partners.”

The survey was conducted among 126 law firms, including 63 from the top 100.

Issue: 7434 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll