header-logo header-logo

27 May 2022
Issue: 7980 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Business in decline at Commercial Courts

London’s Commercial Courts experienced a dramatic drop in activity in the 12 months up to March 2022, compared to the previous year

One third fewer litigants appeared in the courts compared to 2020-21, and there was a 20% decrease in the number of judgments handed down (to 234), according to Portland’s Commercial Courts Report 2022, published last week. However, the proportion of international litigants returned to pre-pandemic levels, with non-UK litigants accounting for 54% of the total number and 75 different nationalities represented.

Moreover, the proportion of Russian litigants was the highest it has ever been, with 41 Russian litigants listed, double the number appearing in 2017. Russian accounted for the second largest group of litigants in the courts, behind the UK.

The report notes that Brexit, judgments no longer being readily enforceable in the EU, and financial institutions and businesses shifting from London to EU27 centres, and competition from new commercial courts in Singapore, Qatar and elsewhere may be a ‘plausible explanatory narrative’ for the decline. It also highlights that the report is based only on results up to March 2022 and the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, sanctions and the withdrawal by London law firms from Russia is ‘likely to be profound’. Consequently, next year’s results may look very different and it may be the ‘end of an era’ for the dominance of Russian litigants. A poll commissioned by Portland found a majority of the public opposed to English courts and law firms accepting Russian litigants while the invasion of Ukraine is ongoing.

Philip Hall, senior partner at Portland, said: ‘It’s too early to tell if we are on the precipice of a decline brought on by the delayed consequences of Covid-19 and other factors―or whether this is a once-off.

‘However, based on the breadth of international litigants choosing London, the city's position as a centre for dispute resolution remains as strong as ever.’

Read the full report here (subscription required).

Issue: 7980 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll