header-logo header-logo

Business in decline at Commercial Courts

27 May 2022
Issue: 7980 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
London’s Commercial Courts experienced a dramatic drop in activity in the 12 months up to March 2022, compared to the previous year

One third fewer litigants appeared in the courts compared to 2020-21, and there was a 20% decrease in the number of judgments handed down (to 234), according to Portland’s Commercial Courts Report 2022, published last week. However, the proportion of international litigants returned to pre-pandemic levels, with non-UK litigants accounting for 54% of the total number and 75 different nationalities represented.

Moreover, the proportion of Russian litigants was the highest it has ever been, with 41 Russian litigants listed, double the number appearing in 2017. Russian accounted for the second largest group of litigants in the courts, behind the UK.

The report notes that Brexit, judgments no longer being readily enforceable in the EU, and financial institutions and businesses shifting from London to EU27 centres, and competition from new commercial courts in Singapore, Qatar and elsewhere may be a ‘plausible explanatory narrative’ for the decline. It also highlights that the report is based only on results up to March 2022 and the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, sanctions and the withdrawal by London law firms from Russia is ‘likely to be profound’. Consequently, next year’s results may look very different and it may be the ‘end of an era’ for the dominance of Russian litigants. A poll commissioned by Portland found a majority of the public opposed to English courts and law firms accepting Russian litigants while the invasion of Ukraine is ongoing.

Philip Hall, senior partner at Portland, said: ‘It’s too early to tell if we are on the precipice of a decline brought on by the delayed consequences of Covid-19 and other factors―or whether this is a once-off.

‘However, based on the breadth of international litigants choosing London, the city's position as a centre for dispute resolution remains as strong as ever.’

Read the full report here (subscription required).

Issue: 7980 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll