header-logo header-logo

07 October 2016 / Monica Feria-Tinta
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Features , Profession , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail

Business as usual?

nlj_7717_tinta

What are the implications of the award in the South China Sea arbitration, asks Monica Feria-Tinta

The much-awaited final award in the South China Sea case (The Republic of The Philippines and The People’s Republic of China, PCA Case No 2013-19), the arbitration case brought by Philippines against China under Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), delivered on 12 July, poses broad and interesting questions on dispute resolution; in particular, on the unconventional role of arbitration, as a mere strategic positioning in the chessboard of a wider spectrum of contentious issues concerning territorial and maritime delimitation in a strategic zone: the South China Sea. The implications of the decision, however, go beyond the confines of public international law or inter-state arbitration. It is of importance for the shipping, insurance and energy sector. This article explores in what way it is so.

Single-party adjudication?

The case, brought by the Philippines against China, concerning “the legal basis of maritime rights and entitlements in the South

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll