header-logo header-logo

07 October 2016 / Monica Feria-Tinta
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Features , Profession , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail

Business as usual?

nlj_7717_tinta

What are the implications of the award in the South China Sea arbitration, asks Monica Feria-Tinta

The much-awaited final award in the South China Sea case (The Republic of The Philippines and The People’s Republic of China, PCA Case No 2013-19), the arbitration case brought by Philippines against China under Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), delivered on 12 July, poses broad and interesting questions on dispute resolution; in particular, on the unconventional role of arbitration, as a mere strategic positioning in the chessboard of a wider spectrum of contentious issues concerning territorial and maritime delimitation in a strategic zone: the South China Sea. The implications of the decision, however, go beyond the confines of public international law or inter-state arbitration. It is of importance for the shipping, insurance and energy sector. This article explores in what way it is so.

Single-party adjudication?

The case, brought by the Philippines against China, concerning “the legal basis of maritime rights and entitlements in the South

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll