header-logo header-logo

Business as usual?

07 October 2016 / Monica Feria-Tinta
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Features , Profession , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail
nlj_7717_tinta

What are the implications of the award in the South China Sea arbitration, asks Monica Feria-Tinta

The much-awaited final award in the South China Sea case (The Republic of The Philippines and The People’s Republic of China, PCA Case No 2013-19), the arbitration case brought by Philippines against China under Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), delivered on 12 July, poses broad and interesting questions on dispute resolution; in particular, on the unconventional role of arbitration, as a mere strategic positioning in the chessboard of a wider spectrum of contentious issues concerning territorial and maritime delimitation in a strategic zone: the South China Sea. The implications of the decision, however, go beyond the confines of public international law or inter-state arbitration. It is of importance for the shipping, insurance and energy sector. This article explores in what way it is so.

Single-party adjudication?

The case, brought by the Philippines against China, concerning “the legal basis of maritime rights and entitlements in the South

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll