header-logo header-logo

29 July 2010 / Paul Smethurst
Issue: 7428 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Bribery , Profession
printer mail-detail

Buyer beware

Paul Smethurst examines the impact & implications of the new Bribery Act

Picture the scene—pine and glass boardroom, champagne and smiles all around. With economic recovery being driven by consolidation you have just successfully assisted your corporate client in the acquisition of a company that will open up new overseas markets, the possibility of government work and access to a team of people who, if lifestyle is anything to go on, are clearly very successful.

Six months on and the mood has changed. Your client has discovered a culture where the “bung” is king in terms of both winning new work and appointing suppliers and wants to know what you did during the deal transaction process to ensure compliance with the Bribery Act 2010 as some very friendly people from the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) are coming in for a chat and by the way who is your PI insurer?

The Bribery Act 2010 received Royal Assent in April and its provisions are expected to come into force in April 2011. As well

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll