header-logo header-logo

22 October 2009 / Dr Richard Burnley , Dr Russell Richardson
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Features , Competition
printer mail-detail

Buyer power

Should the smallest boy in the park give up his ball to the biggest? ask Dr Russell Richardson & Dr Richard Burnley

Mobile Call Termination (MCT) is the service provided by a mobile operator at the wholesale level that allows other operators to terminate calls on its network. Mobile operators must purchase call termination from other operators in order to be able to connect their customers to other networks.

On 16 July 2009, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by Hutchison 3G UK Limited (H3G) of the Competition Appeal Tribunal’s (CAT) judgment, which upheld Ofcom’s finding in March 2007 that H3G has significant market power (SMP) in the market for the provision of MCT. While H3G held a monopoly position on the market, and could be expected automatically to have SMP, the facts of this case were less straightforward.

In particular, the issue was whether BT, as one of H3G’s largest customers for MCT, could dictate what it should pay for the provision of MCT by H3G. To borrow the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll