header-logo header-logo

Cab-rank rule future

30 September 2010
Issue: 7435 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Barristers to Assess Future of Cab-Rank RuleThe Bar Standards Board (BSB) is considering whether to reform the cab-rank rule, under which barristers must accept any brief in a field in which they are competent.

Barristers to Assess Future of Cab-Rank RuleThe Bar Standards Board (BSB) is considering whether to reform the cab-rank rule, under which barristers must accept any brief in a field in which they are competent. The discussions, centred around the potential impact on the profession of the new business structures permitted by the Legal Services Act 2007, can be found in the BSB consultation paper, ‘Regulating Entities’, which was launched this week.

Barristers are asked for their views on whether the rule should apply to advocates in the new business structure as well as self-employed barristers, and whether it should apply to all advocates in that entity or only the barristers. The paper considers the scope of the rule and whether it should be limited, and asks whether there is a risk it can be abused.The broad-ranging paper also asks whether restrictions on barristers providing litigation services and holding client money should be lifted.

In August, a YouGov survey found that 35% of barristers would be ‘likely’ or ‘very likely’ to join a new business structure within the next five years if the BSB was to regulate them.

The possible new structures are: Barrister Only Entities (BOEs), businesses with barrister owners and managers alone; Legal Disciplinary Practices (LDPs), businesses with lawyer owners and managers alone; and Alternative Business Structures (ABSs), businesses with both lawyer and non-lawyer owners and managers.BSB chair, Baroness Ruth Deech said there could be “substantial benefits to the public and increased access to justice if we update our regulatory arrangements to reflect the Act”.

Responses are due by 23 December 2010. The consultation is the third in a series to address the implications of the Act. Previous consultations were ‘Legal Services Act 2007–Regulation Implications’, published in January 2008, and ‘Legal Services Act 2007–Legal Disciplinary Practices and Partnerships of Barristers’, published in December 2008.
 

Issue: 7435 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll