header-logo header-logo

26 April 2017
Issue: 7743 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Call for inclusive judiciary

Justice report highlights barriers to diversity & suggests reforms

Justice, the leading civil liberties organisation, has issued a call to action on the way senior judges are selected.

Its report, Increasing judicial diversity, launched this week, notes that the senior judiciary is dominated by white, privately educated men, and that Lady Hale is the only female Justice at the Supreme Court. It calls for systemic change to increase accountability on selection and proposes new routes to the senior bench.

‘Now is the perfect time for change,’ said Justice director Andrea Coomber.

‘We are faced with an unprecedented opportunity as the majority of the Supreme Court—all nine judges from England and Wales—will be replaced over the next three years, resulting in vacancies cascading down the judiciary. With such a high number of appointments opening up, there is a real chance to change swiftly the demographic composition of our senior judiciary.’

The report highlights the natural tendency in senior selections to replicate the characteristics of the existing judiciary, meaning ‘merit’ can become a vehicle for unconscious bias. Another potential barrier is that the vast majority of circuit judges are former barristers—the report suggests that, while the Bar produces many excellent judges, a wider pool and an upward career path for judges in the lower courts would make for a more inclusive bench.

It suggests a raft of measures, including selection targets with ‘teeth’ in the shape of an obligation to comply or explain decisions to the Justice Select Committee. A permanent ‘Senior Selections Committee’ could be set up for appointments to the Court of Appeal, Heads of Division and Supreme Court, setting targets for each level and reporting to a Parliamentary committee.

Other suggestions are greater use of flexible working, ‘appointable pools’ of suitable judges for each court as part of a rolling, proactive recruitment programme, and an upward judicial career path where entry-level positions in the tribunal system can lead to the senior judiciary.

Issue: 7743 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll