header-logo header-logo

Call for inclusive judiciary

26 April 2017
Issue: 7743 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Justice report highlights barriers to diversity & suggests reforms

Justice, the leading civil liberties organisation, has issued a call to action on the way senior judges are selected.

Its report, Increasing judicial diversity, launched this week, notes that the senior judiciary is dominated by white, privately educated men, and that Lady Hale is the only female Justice at the Supreme Court. It calls for systemic change to increase accountability on selection and proposes new routes to the senior bench.

‘Now is the perfect time for change,’ said Justice director Andrea Coomber.

‘We are faced with an unprecedented opportunity as the majority of the Supreme Court—all nine judges from England and Wales—will be replaced over the next three years, resulting in vacancies cascading down the judiciary. With such a high number of appointments opening up, there is a real chance to change swiftly the demographic composition of our senior judiciary.’

The report highlights the natural tendency in senior selections to replicate the characteristics of the existing judiciary, meaning ‘merit’ can become a vehicle for unconscious bias. Another potential barrier is that the vast majority of circuit judges are former barristers—the report suggests that, while the Bar produces many excellent judges, a wider pool and an upward career path for judges in the lower courts would make for a more inclusive bench.

It suggests a raft of measures, including selection targets with ‘teeth’ in the shape of an obligation to comply or explain decisions to the Justice Select Committee. A permanent ‘Senior Selections Committee’ could be set up for appointments to the Court of Appeal, Heads of Division and Supreme Court, setting targets for each level and reporting to a Parliamentary committee.

Other suggestions are greater use of flexible working, ‘appointable pools’ of suitable judges for each court as part of a rolling, proactive recruitment programme, and an upward judicial career path where entry-level positions in the tribunal system can lead to the senior judiciary.

Issue: 7743 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll