header-logo header-logo

12 May 2016
Issue: 7698 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Call for legal clarity on drone use

The government needs to clarify its legal case for the use of lethal drones outside armed conflict, MPs and Peers have said in a report into the targeted RAF drone strike in Syria of suspected terrorist and UK national Reyaad Khan in August 2015. The government stated that the strike was part of the same armed conflict in which the UK was already involved in Syria.

In a report published this week, The Government’s policy on the use of drones for targeted killing, the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) accept the government’s justification. However, it states government policy allows lethal force to be used abroad, outside of armed conflict, when there is no other way of preventing an imminent terrorist attack against the UK. It concludes that the legal basis of this policy, and also any support for lethal force by other countries, requires urgent clarification.

The report proposes giving the Intelligence and Security Committee a more prominent role in oversight. It urges the government to develop international consensus about the legal use of lethal force in counterterrorism operations.

Issue: 7698 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll