header-logo header-logo

Call for legal clarity on drone use

12 May 2016
Issue: 7698 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The government needs to clarify its legal case for the use of lethal drones outside armed conflict, MPs and Peers have said in a report into the targeted RAF drone strike in Syria of suspected terrorist and UK national Reyaad Khan in August 2015. The government stated that the strike was part of the same armed conflict in which the UK was already involved in Syria.

In a report published this week, The Government’s policy on the use of drones for targeted killing, the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) accept the government’s justification. However, it states government policy allows lethal force to be used abroad, outside of armed conflict, when there is no other way of preventing an imminent terrorist attack against the UK. It concludes that the legal basis of this policy, and also any support for lethal force by other countries, requires urgent clarification.

The report proposes giving the Intelligence and Security Committee a more prominent role in oversight. It urges the government to develop international consensus about the legal use of lethal force in counterterrorism operations.

Issue: 7698 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll