header-logo header-logo

18 July 2025 / Charles Davey
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Features , Tort , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Call of duty?

225839
Charles Davey reports on the police’s duty of care to warn domestic abuse victims of an imminent attack
  • Examines the facts of Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police v Woodcock, in which it was found that the police have no duty of care to warn potential victims of danger.

By way of background to Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police v Woodcock [2025] EWCA Civ 13, Mrs W had been in an ‘on-off’ relationship with RG for two years. During that time, Mrs W had made complaints of threats by RG to kill her, RG was convicted of head-butting Mrs W’s husband, and RG had received repeated harassment warnings. RG went on to breach bail conditions on multiple occasions.

On 4 February 2015, Mrs W ended the relationship. She reported that RG had made threats of serious violence to her, her young son and daughter. In that month, RG was ejected from Mrs W’s workplace and arrested for criminal damage and harassment. He was bailed, with prohibitions on contacting Mrs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll