header-logo header-logo

18 July 2025 / Charles Davey
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Features , Tort , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Call of duty?

225839
Charles Davey reports on the police’s duty of care to warn domestic abuse victims of an imminent attack
  • Examines the facts of Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police v Woodcock, in which it was found that the police have no duty of care to warn potential victims of danger.

By way of background to Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police v Woodcock [2025] EWCA Civ 13, Mrs W had been in an ‘on-off’ relationship with RG for two years. During that time, Mrs W had made complaints of threats by RG to kill her, RG was convicted of head-butting Mrs W’s husband, and RG had received repeated harassment warnings. RG went on to breach bail conditions on multiple occasions.

On 4 February 2015, Mrs W ended the relationship. She reported that RG had made threats of serious violence to her, her young son and daughter. In that month, RG was ejected from Mrs W’s workplace and arrested for criminal damage and harassment. He was bailed, with prohibitions on contacting Mrs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll