header-logo header-logo

10 December 2019
Issue: 7868 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-detail

Call to review hourly rates

Costs lawyers have called for an urgent review of the guideline hourly rates―the baseline figures used by judges to assess the fees charged by solicitors

An Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) poll of 72 of its members who attended its annual conference in Manchester last week found 60% in favour of urgent action while a further 26% said it would be ‘helpful’.

The rates have not changed since 2010. ACL chair Claire Green said a review was ‘vital for the solicitors’ profession… They fail to take into account the considerable increase in overheads that firms have had to swallow since 2010’.

Nearly three-quarters of costs lawyers said the electronic bill of costs has increased the costs of assessment, as users get to grips with it. A mere 5% thought judges were keen to use the new bill and only 4% reported that solicitors are getting the hang of it. 

Issue: 7868 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll