header-logo header-logo

14 July 2016 / Sarah Moore
Issue: 7707 / Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Campaign overdrive?

nlj_7707_moore

Political & product liability: Sarah Moore highlights what politicians & toothpaste do not have in common

 
  • ​While the consumer is protected against the misleading claims of toothpaste and other product advertisers, the voter remains exposed to the unchecked claims of all political parties.

In what is proving to be a seismic episode for British politics, not to mention the financial markets—the news that the Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) has received complaints relating to pre-referendum political advertising may well have escaped the attention of the general public.

According to a report in The Guardian on 28 June 2016 (“Ad watchdog powerless to act on controversial Brexit campaigns”), ASA has received almost 400 complaints about what petitioners have called misleading, inaccurate and discriminatory ads intended to influence voters ahead of the referendum.

Complaints concerned a range of materials, including high profile Vote Leave advertisements stating: “Let’s give our NHS the £350m the EU takes every week.” This message was also emblazoned on the side of the campaign’s battle bus: “We send the EU £350 million a week—let’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll