header-logo header-logo

Can compulsory mediation take the strain?

01 September 2023 / Catherine Penny
Issue: 8038 / Categories: Features , Profession , Mediation , ADR
printer mail-detail
135190
Catherine Penny queries whether enforced mediation is necessary for larger commercial disputes
  • It is plainly sensible for mediation to be made compulsory for lower value claims.
  • There are however many more complexities in larger commercial claims, in terms of form, substance and participants; what’s more, mediation is already well used in such cases.

The Ministry of Justice published its response to a consultation on the subject of compulsory mediation in July—a consultation which it began over a year ago. The government’s plan is to have mandatory mediation for all defended Pt 7 civil claims in the county court, ie mostly claims for under £10,000, with sanctions for non-compliance. A later plan is to move towards making mediation mandatory for larger civil claims (those up to £25,000) in the county court too. It begs the question: will this lead to compulsory mediation for larger commercial claims?

As the consultation response recognises, in the UK we have a well-established mediation culture, certainly for larger and complex litigation cases,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll