header-logo header-logo

Can compulsory mediation take the strain?

01 September 2023 / Catherine Penny
Issue: 8038 / Categories: Features , Profession , Mediation , ADR
printer mail-detail
135190
Catherine Penny queries whether enforced mediation is necessary for larger commercial disputes
  • It is plainly sensible for mediation to be made compulsory for lower value claims.
  • There are however many more complexities in larger commercial claims, in terms of form, substance and participants; what’s more, mediation is already well used in such cases.

The Ministry of Justice published its response to a consultation on the subject of compulsory mediation in July—a consultation which it began over a year ago. The government’s plan is to have mandatory mediation for all defended Pt 7 civil claims in the county court, ie mostly claims for under £10,000, with sanctions for non-compliance. A later plan is to move towards making mediation mandatory for larger civil claims (those up to £25,000) in the county court too. It begs the question: will this lead to compulsory mediation for larger commercial claims?

As the consultation response recognises, in the UK we have a well-established mediation culture, certainly for larger and complex litigation cases,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll