header-logo header-logo

Can compulsory mediation take the strain?

01 September 2023 / Catherine Penny
Issue: 8038 / Categories: Features , Profession , Mediation , ADR
printer mail-detail
135190
Catherine Penny queries whether enforced mediation is necessary for larger commercial disputes
  • It is plainly sensible for mediation to be made compulsory for lower value claims.
  • There are however many more complexities in larger commercial claims, in terms of form, substance and participants; what’s more, mediation is already well used in such cases.

The Ministry of Justice published its response to a consultation on the subject of compulsory mediation in July—a consultation which it began over a year ago. The government’s plan is to have mandatory mediation for all defended Pt 7 civil claims in the county court, ie mostly claims for under £10,000, with sanctions for non-compliance. A later plan is to move towards making mediation mandatory for larger civil claims (those up to £25,000) in the county court too. It begs the question: will this lead to compulsory mediation for larger commercial claims?

As the consultation response recognises, in the UK we have a well-established mediation culture, certainly for larger and complex litigation cases,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll