header-logo header-logo

01 September 2023 / Catherine Penny
Issue: 8038 / Categories: Features , Profession , Mediation , ADR
printer mail-detail

Can compulsory mediation take the strain?

135190
Catherine Penny queries whether enforced mediation is necessary for larger commercial disputes
  • It is plainly sensible for mediation to be made compulsory for lower value claims.
  • There are however many more complexities in larger commercial claims, in terms of form, substance and participants; what’s more, mediation is already well used in such cases.

The Ministry of Justice published its response to a consultation on the subject of compulsory mediation in July—a consultation which it began over a year ago. The government’s plan is to have mandatory mediation for all defended Pt 7 civil claims in the county court, ie mostly claims for under £10,000, with sanctions for non-compliance. A later plan is to move towards making mediation mandatory for larger civil claims (those up to £25,000) in the county court too. It begs the question: will this lead to compulsory mediation for larger commercial claims?

As the consultation response recognises, in the UK we have a well-established mediation culture, certainly for larger and complex litigation cases,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll