header-logo header-logo

28 July 2016
Issue: 7709 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Can lawyers place faith in Truss?

The appointment of the new Lord Chancellor, Liz Truss, has caused members of the legal profession to call into question her ability to do the job.

Barrister Bob Neill, chair of the justice select committee, expressed doubts as Truss is neither a qualified lawyer nor has experience in a senior cabinet position. Justice minister Lord Faulks questioned her “clout” when standing up to the prime minister, and resigned from government in protest.

Writing in NLJ this week, columnist Jon Robins says Michael Gove, Truss’s predecessor, dodged criticism because his policies were pleasing to the legal profession. Chris Grayling, Gove’s predecessor, endured a rougher time in the post as he had both a non-legal background and unpopular policies.

As for Liz Truss, not much is known. Robins points out that she repeatedly voted in favour of cuts to legal aid during the passage of LASPO. She also served on the justice select committee for five years where, Robins says, she “demonstrated little sympathy for preserving access to justice”.

Issue: 7709 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll