header-logo header-logo

09 April 2025
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Damages , Compensation , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Car crash compensation under review

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has confirmed it will review the whiplash reforms this year, despite a glowing review from the Treasury.

In March, the Treasury reported that the whiplash reforms have reduced insurance premiums by about £31 per policyholder, close to the promised £35.

Last week, however, justice minister Sir Nicholas Dakin told MPs: ‘Although it is a factual reporting of the information from insurers provided to HM Treasury through the Financial Conduct Authority, it does not represent the government’s view, so it is right and proper that, separately from the report, the MoJ will undertake a post-implementation review of the whiplash reforms later this year.’

Sir Nicholas was speaking during a debate on the draft Whiplash Injury (Amendment) Regulations 2025, which uprates the tariff values.

Reforms to whiplash law in 2021 introduced fixed tariffs, increased the small claims threshold from £1,000 to £5,000, and required a medical report before settlement of claims.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll